Construction and operation of the pool (Special Exception granted by the Montgomery County Board of Appeals, Cases 2364 & CBA-2364)
Shannon v. Bel Pre Recreational Association, Montgomery County Circuit Court case no. 67941E
Summary from BPRA minutes (August 1, 1979 to January 2, 1980)
Ramsay v. Bel Pre Recreation Association
decision of the Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities, Case 369-0, May 18, 1998
Ramsay v. Bel Pre Recreational Association
decision of the Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities, Case 547-0, December 11, 2002
decision of the Montgomery County Circuit Court (hearing held July 25, 2003)
decision of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Case 1797, July 28, 2004
Klang v. Bel Pre Recreational Association, Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities case no. 47-10 (2010)
Letter from the Commission on Common Ownership Communities, June 10, 2010
Summary from BPRA minutes (June 28, 2010 to August 23, 2010)
Henry v. Bel Pre Recreational Association; and Henry v. Guirand
decision of the Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities, Case 40-09, July 2, 2010
decision of the Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities, Case 40-09, August 2, 2010
decision of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Civil Case 336832, February 9, 2011
decision of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Case, January 2012
decision of the Maryland Court of Appeals, Petition Docket, June 27, 2012
decision of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Civil Case 364472, September 27, 2012
decision of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Case 2325, January 10, 2014
decision of the Maryland Court of Special Appeals on motion to reconsider, Case 2325, November 19, 2014
decision of the Maryland Court of Appeals, Petition Docket 614, February 23, 2015, on motion for a review of the Court of Special Appeals decision (“Writ of Certiorari”)
decision of the Maryland Court of Appeals, Petition Docket 614, June 19, 2015, on motion for clarification of its decision of February 23, 2015
decision of the Maryland Court of Appeals, Petition Docket 614, September 2, 2015, denying motion to reconsider its decision of February 23, 2015
Guirand v. BPRA, Montgomery County Circuit Court Case #383580
Tanie and Pierre Guirand Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, October 29, 2013
BPRA Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of Law, February 10, 2014
Guirand Response to BPRA Motion to Dismiss, requesting hearing, February 28, 2014
BPRA Reply to Guirand Response to Motion to Dismiss, March 18, 2014
BPRA Answer to Guirand Complaint, April 8, 2014
BPRA Counterclaim, April 30, 2014
Guirand Answer to BPRA Counterclaim, July 17, 2014
BPRA request to Pierre Guirand for production of documents, July 29. 2014
BPRA request to Tanie Guirand for production of documents, July 29, 2014
BPRA interrogatories to Pierre Guirand, July 29, 2014
BPRA interrogatories to Tanie Guirand, July 29, 2014
Guirand response to request for production of documents, September 19, 2014
Pierre Guirand answers to BPRA interrogatories, September 19, 2014
Tanie Guirand answers to BPRA interrogatories, September 19, 2014
Guirand request for production of documents, September 26, 2014
Guirand interrogatories to BPRA, September 26
Settlement Agreement, October 27, 2014
Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, November 14, 2014
Implementation schedule deadlines:
December 10, 2014 – Guirands submit landscaping plan to BPRA – submitted February 25, 2015
January 10, 2015 – fence relocated – Birchtree Lane side of fence relocated in mid-January 2015, Bustelton Lane side of fence relocation overdue
April 11, 2015 (originally January 24, 2015) – joint agreement on landscaping plan reached (if the parties did not reach an agreement by then, Ted Bechtol was authorized to arbitrate)
May 15, 2015 – landscaping installed
Klang v. BPRA, Maryland Attorney General, Office of Consumer Protection, Case MU-254930
complaint referred to mediator by Office of Consumer Protection
BPRA response dated August 7, 2015 [September 7, 2015]